venerdì 7 febbraio 2014

Haute Autorité de Santé - Outils de sécurisation et d'autoévaluation de l'administration des médicaments en hospitalisation incluant le secteur en HAD

Haute Autorité de Santé - Outils de sécurisation et d'autoévaluation de l'administration des médicaments en hospitalisation incluant le secteur en HAD

Haute Autorité de Santé - Mieux prévenir et prendre en charge les moments de violence dans l’évolution clinique des patients adultes lors des hospitalisations en services de psychiatrie - Note de cadrage

Haute Autorité de Santé - Mieux prévenir et prendre en charge les moments de violence dans l’évolution clinique des patients adultes lors des hospitalisations en services de psychiatrie - Note de cadrage

Thalidomide victims receive $89m compensation Settlement ends a long battle with the drug’s distributor and will compensate more than 100 Australians and New Zealanders

An $89m compensation payment for people left with birth defects after their mothers took thalidomide has been approved.
More than 100 Australian and New Zealand victims will be compensated in the landmark settlement after the Victorian supreme court signed off on the settlement on Friday.
Lawyer Peter Gordon, acting for the victims, told the court the settlement was a fair and compassionate resolution.
He said there were no objectors and no objections.
“No one has submitted any complaint,“ Gordon said.
The $89m will be paid by the drug’s distributor, Diageo, with thalidomide’s manufacturer Grunenthal not included in the agreement.
The settlement ends a long compensation battle by the thalidomide victims, many of whom were born with missing or shortened limbs.
Thalidomide, a drug to counter morning sickness, was withdrawn from sale in 1961.
The drug was distributed in Australia and New Zealand around 1960 and 1961 by Distillers, which became part of Diageo in 1997.
  • theguardian.com

EffRx inks pact with 3 pharma firms to distribute its osteoporosis drug, Binosto in Italy, Spain & Portugal

EffRx Pharmaceuticals SA has signed exclusive distribution agreements with three leading local pharmaceutical companies in Italy, Spain and Portugal for Binosto - EffRx’s innovative osteoporosis medication. Under the terms of the agreement, EffRx grants exclusive marketing authorization and distribution rights to Abiogen Pharma SpA for Italy, Lacer SA for Spain, and Laboratorios Atral SA for Portugal.

Binosto is the first and only buffered solution for the treatment of osteoporosis, delivering fracture-risk reduction at the hip & spine. Binosto is administered as an effervescent tablet for oral solution and offers convenience for the patient. Binosto is currently marketed in the United States, and approved in Europe and Australia; approvals in other territories are pending. Binosto was originally developed by EffRx through an agreement with Merck & Co, Inc. granting EffRx worldwide rights to all Merck effervescent and related patents protecting alendronate.

EffRx expects the launch in these markets beginning in the second quarter 2014. Italy, Spain and Portugal are three major markets for osteoporosis treatment in Europe. EffRx is confident that the promise of Binosto will also become true in other European countries with the appointment of distribution partners that have a sizeable footprint as well as in-depth understanding of their local markets.

Christer Rosén, chairman and CEO of EffRx Pharmaceuticals said, “We are thrilled to announce the partnerships with Abiogen, Lacer, and Atral.  These partners, with their well-established sales forces, are well positioned to drive Binosto to a market leadership position.”

EffRx is committed to making Binosto available to osteoporosis patients around the world and is currently discussing the commercialization of Binosto with pharmaceutical companies in other key Regions and countries.

EffRx Pharmaceuticals is an innovative specialty pharmaceutical company that exploits its proprietary technology platform to create novel therapeutic entities.

'Indian pharma sector may undergo major consolidation in key segments'

Indian pharma sector is expected to witness a major consolidation within the industry, especially in the API sector to meet the growing market demand and challenges globally, according to Singhi Advisors, a Mumbai based global investment banking firm. Understanding the changing dynamics of the Indian pharma industry, the company expressed keen interest in providing their expertise and services in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and capital raising initiatives to those interested in expanding their business worldwide.

Interestingly, to get better exposure in the local market, multi-nationals and larger domestic players are understood to be scouting for collaborative initiative with mid market players. Simultaneously, various mid size companies are looking at the possibility of joint ventures and M&As to enhance their chance at getting global acceptance by associating with well established players. Singhi Advisors an expert in this field will be dolling out their expertise in this area by identifying companies with growth potential but low financial and investment backing.

Mahesh Singhi, managing director of Singhi Advisors pointed out this will be a win-win situation for all especially the small and mid market cos as they will be able to get easy access to the required capital, organisational capability and exposure to advanced technologies and processes needed to upgrade their existing capacity, while opening up a great market opportunity both domestically and globally for all the parties. Singhi stressed, “Our focus will be on filling out the gaps prevalent in this area by inward integration of pharma sector by providing wider platform to our clients. This we plan to do by identifying their bottlenecks so that we can help them with proper advice by finding key partners to explore further business proposition for expanding and scaling up their business further.”

Experts inform that low entry barriers in the market have led to rapid growth of unorganised sector in the county resulting in inefficiency and duplicability of the process. Industry insiders feel that such collaborative efforts will help nullifying competition from the local market as small and mid size companies with potential can work out a proposition to either enter into a JV or merge with bigger players, which will be mutually beneficial for all.

Gopal Agrawal, partner, Singhi Advisors informs that their focus will be on identifying such companies who have high potential but lack the technological knowhow to make it into the global market, while at the same time have a very strong base in the local market. “There is a changing trend in the pharma sector, wherein various large and median companies are increasingly coming into focus due to their strong presence in the local or domestic market. This is a great sign as India has lot of mid market or even large companies with high potential who get side tracked due to lack of technological capabilities. With correct knowledge and proper valuation, we can sure integrate the best of both, to boost their business interest in a growing market,” Agrawal stressed.

Singhi Advisors have recently advised two Indian Companies viz Span Diagnostic and Sunways India in identifying strategic investors namely ARKRAY Inc. and Rohto Pharmaceuticals Inc. respectively. Both the strategic investors are from Japan which again is the key focus country with Singhi where they have done five transactions over last one year, being highest by any Advisory firm in India.

The company also plans to focus on applying this strategy in the medical device and biotech sector, as most of the key players in the domestic market especially in the medical device sector belong to the SMEs with a few global giants dominating the market.

Omeros' OMS824 Huntington's disease programme receives US FDA fast track designation

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted Fast Track designation to Omeros Corporation's phosphodiesterase 10 (PDE10) inhibitor, OMS824 for the treatment of cognitive impairment in patients with Huntington's disease. OMS824 selectively inhibits PDE10, an enzyme expressed in areas of the brain linked to a wide range of diseases that affect cognition, including Huntington's disease and schizophrenia.

Omeros has conducted successful clinical trials assessing the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and target engagement of a wide range of doses of OMS824 in its phase I programme. Positive data from the company's OMS824 phase IIa schizophrenia trial were recently announced, and Omeros expects to begin enrolling patients this quarter in its phase II trial evaluating OMS824 for Huntington's disease.

FDA's Fast Track programme facilitates the development of drugs intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and that have the potential to address unmet medical needs. A drug programme with Fast Track status is afforded greater access to the FDA for the purpose of expediting the drug's development, review and potential approval. Many drugs that receive Fast Track designation are also considered appropriate to receive Priority Review, and their respective New Drug Applications (NDAs) may be accepted by the FDA as a "rolling submission" in which portions of an NDA are reviewed before the complete application is submitted. Priority Review and rolling submission can each provide further acceleration of FDA's approval process.

"FDA's Fast Track designation of OMS824 for Huntington's disease reflects the unmet need associated with cognitive impairment in Huntington's patients and recognizes the drug's potential to treat this condition," stated Gregory A Demopulos, MD, chairman and chief executive officer of Omeros. "Together with the orphan drug status previously awarded OMS824 by the FDA for Huntington's, we have the opportunity to streamline the development of this promising compound. We look forward to enrolling patients in our OMS824 phase II clinical trial for Huntington's disease within the next few weeks."

PDE10 is an enzyme that is expressed in areas of the brain linked to diseases that affect cognition and psychomotor functions, including Huntington's disease and schizophrenia. Huntington's disease is a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder that leads to movement, cognition, and behavioral abnormalities and premature death. Schizophrenia is a group of severe brain disorders characterized by an abnormal interpretation of reality, which can manifest as delusions, hallucinations, and/or disordered thinking and behavior. Cognitive dysfunction is responsible for substantial disability in both of these diseases and is not meaningfully improved by current medications.

Omeros' proprietary compound OMS824, currently in phase II clinical programmes, inhibits PDE10 and is being developed for the treatment of cognitive disorders. In addition to potential benefits on cognition, OMS824 could also improve the motor and psychiatric abnormalities in Huntington's disease as well as the positive (e.g., hallucinations) and negative (e.g., flat affect) symptoms of schizophrenia. Omeros has been awarded both Orphan Drug and Fast Track Designations by the US FDA to evaluate OMS824 in Huntington's disease, and a Fast Track application to the FDA for the evaluation of OMS824 in schizophrenia is currently under review.

Omeros is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company committed to discovering, developing and commercializing small-molecule and protein therapeutics targeting inflammation, coagulopathies and disorders of the central nervous system.

Indian oncologists upset with Roche’s move to stall marketing of biosimilar drug for breast cancer trastuzumab

Indian oncologists are annoyed over the Swiss drug major Roche's recent move to stall marketing of biosimilar drug for breast cancer trastuzumab by the biosimilar manufacturing majors Biocon and Mylan. They are upset that the poor breast cancer patients in the country cannot have access to affordable drugs.

It is reported that in 2012, the global sales for Herceptin is US$ 6.4 billion and in India it witnessed sales of US$ 21 million.

Standard treatments for breast cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, hormone therapy and targeted therapies, including biologics. The survival rate for breast cancer patients in the US has improved to nearly 90 per cent after the introduction of biologics, improved screening, and other treatment enhancements.

The concept of affordable cancer drugs being made available to the poor Indian patients has not been acceptable by the multinational company, said a section of pharma consultants.

Disallowing patient’s access to affordable and quality drugs is not the right move. The multinational companies have done it again and want to indicate their muscle power in the cancer medication space. All MNC drugs are expensive and unaffordable to the poor patients, stated a section of junior doctors from the Kidwai Institute of Oncology who did not want to be named.

“Biocon and Mylan are pedigreed, world class companies with stellar R&D facilities, staffed by very capable scientists who are known for innovation. They are not new to the world of biologicals and have several biological products to their credit such as Insulin analogues, and growth factors available across the world, serving the cause of millions of disadvantaged,” points out Dr Vineet Gupta, director, HealthCare Global Enterprises.

Both Canmab and Hertraz are molecules that every Indian should be proud of, as they offer hope to thousands of women with breast cancer who otherwise would not have been able to afford the multinational molecule such as Herclone or Biceltis, added Dr Gupta.

How many women must die before affordable trastuzumab is available, and when will the government wake up and heed to the voice of the feeble, questions Dr Gupta

Article NICE quality standard to boost care of anxiety disorders

Article NICE quality standard to boost care of anxiety disorders

Article Lilly lead doctor nominations...so far

Article Lilly lead doctor nominations...so far

Article FDA drug label plan "would increase US generics bill by $4B/year"

Article FDA drug label plan "would increase US generics bill by $4B/year"

Article How Big Pharma is "humanising" its brands

Article How Big Pharma is "humanising" its brands

Article Merck & Co to test cancer drug with Pfizer, Amgen, Incyte

Article Merck & Co to test cancer drug with Pfizer, Amgen, Incyte

giovedì 6 febbraio 2014

World Pharma News | Roche delivers strong 2013 results

World Pharma News | Roche delivers strong 2013 results

World Pharma News | Body kills 'spontaneous' blood cancers on a daily basis

World Pharma News | Body kills 'spontaneous' blood cancers on a daily basis

World Pharma News | Experts issue 'blueprint for action' to combat shortages of life-saving drugs

World Pharma News | Experts issue 'blueprint for action' to combat shortages of life-saving drugs

World Pharma News | Existing medicines show promise for treating stomach and bowel cancer

World Pharma News | Existing medicines show promise for treating stomach and bowel cancer

World Pharma News | Tafinlar® receives FDA Breakthrough Therapy designation for non-small cell lung cancer with BRAF mutation

World Pharma News | Tafinlar® receives FDA Breakthrough Therapy designation for non-small cell lung cancer with BRAF mutation

World Pharma News | Electronically controlled drugs could minimize side effects

World Pharma News | Electronically controlled drugs could minimize side effects

martedì 4 febbraio 2014

Trend towards advanced specialty healthcare accelerating in the Middle East

Industry leaders at Arab Health 2014 to review delivery of healthcare services in the Middle East
Dubai, UAE: Although science and technology will undoubtedly play a significant role in enhancing
and enabling better healthcare provision in the future, it will be equally important for countries in
the Middle East to focus on improving the delivery of healthcare services and associated business
processes such as the development of primary care and specialised care services. This issue will be debated at the Leaders in Healthcare Conference during the 39th Arab Health
Exhibition & Congress from 27 -30 January 2014 at the Dubai International Convention & Exhibition
Center.
According to Professor Lord Darzi of Denham, Hamlyn Chair of Surgery, Director, Institute of Global
Health Innovation, Imperial College London, UK, and speaker at the Leaders in Healthcare
Conference, “The Middle East should move towards specialised care, but in parallel to developing
effective primary care services which should form the basic foundation of a healthcare system. There
is a need to build efficient and disease-specific models of prevention and specialised care that
deliver quality outcomes in the most cost-effective way possible. One example of this is Qatar’s
National Cancer Strategy. This looks at all aspects of cancer prevention and management drawing on
robust international evidence, and is reshaping the treatment and support patients receive. The
Middle East is also increasingly attracting international academic and clinical research talent and
emerging as a location for biomedical research. We are starting to see this feed into the
development of specialised care services and the creation of disease-specific research strategies.”
Healthcare spend in the region is expected to reach $133.19bn in 20181
. Lord Darzi believes that
regional investment opportunities include the development of regional specialist providers,
enhanced primary care services, the development of regionally based capacity to manufacture
pharmaceuticals and medical equipment, and the development of a regional talent pool to reduce
the reliance on imported human capital. These are all growth areas in the region’s healthcare sector. Commenting on this growth trajectory, Steven J. Thompson, Senior Vice President, Johns Hopkins
Medicine and CEO, Johns Hopkins Medicine International says, “Over the past decade Johns Hopkins
Medicine has engaged in a number of exciting and highly successful health care collaborations in the
Middle East. Many government agencies and leading companies in the region have placed a high
priority on increasing the accessibility, quality and safety of health care delivery, as well as on adding
advanced specialty care. More hospitals in the Middle East are becoming world class institutions,
and that trend seems only to be accelerating.”
1 Arabianindustry.com 3 June 2013 http://bit.ly/1bcT9WjScience and technology will play a significant role in enhancing and enabling better healthcare
provision in the future and managing spiraling healthcare costs. “For example, we are already seeing the impact that smartphones and digital applications are having
as a cost effective and patient targeted method of managing chronic diseases like diabetes. These
will change the landscape of primary and community care delivery over the next decade. Personalised medicine will revolutionise healthcare by allowing for the tailoring of treatments to
each patient. Gone will be the days of trial and error; prescribing courses of treatment that do not
work. Through a combination of genomic information, tissue imaging data and clinical outcomes, we
will know what will work for a particular patient with a certain genomic profile,” says Lord Darzi.
-END- Note to Editors
About Arab Health Exhibition & Congress: Arab Health Exhibition & Congress is the largest healthcare event in the Middle East. Established 39
years ago, Arab Health provides a platform for the world’s leading manufacturers, wholesalers and
distributors to meet the medical and scientific community in the Middle East and subcontinent. Arab
Health, organised by Informa Life Sciences Exhibitions, takes place from 27-30 January 2014 at the
Dubai International Convention & Exhibition Centre. With more than 3900 exhibiting companies
from 63 countries and 19 healthcare conferences with an estimated 9000 delegates, Arab Health is a
much anticipated addition to the 2014 medical event calendar. Website: www.arabhealthonline.com
About Institute of Global Health Innovation:
Website: http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/global-health-innovation
About Johns Hopkins Medicine International:
Website: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/international/
For press enquires please contact:
Inga Stevens
Senior Communication Manager, Informa Life Sciences Exhibitions
T: +971 4 407 2743
inga.stevens@informa.com

Big Data to drive reduced healthcare costs and improved quality of care in GCC

International case studies to be presented at Big Data Conference at Arab Health 2014
Dubai, UAE: The GCC has all of the necessary factors to enable Big Data to launch with success.
There are several large healthcare systems and regulators bringing together enormous amounts of
data in real time about their patients and populations. The region also has access to cutting edge IT
and mobile technologies to collect and manage the data. More importantly, it is equipped with the
tools and growing talent to perform analytics in the healthcare sector. A panel of international and regional experts will highlight the global outcomes of implementing Big
Data in healthcare during the Big Data Conference at the 39th Arab Health Exhibition & Congress
from 28-29 January 2014 at the Dubai International Convention & Exhibition Centre.
There is a worldwide divide between laboratory scientists who continuously produce new research
findings and medical professionals in their clinical settings who need to be aware of these results.
The same applies to patient medical records that need to be accessible across a number of
specialties. This divide is more pronounced in the developing world due to the lack of conscious
effort to translate research findings into clinical practice through analytics. Bridging this gap through
sharing the latest health information will have a positive impact on patients and can even be
lifesaving.
According to Daniel Whitehead, MENA Healthcare Lead, Booz Allen Hamilton, “Using data analytics
on electronic health records in real time can offer enormous benefits for patients in this region. For
example, predictive analytics can be used to identify which patients are more at risk of life
threatening complications in the ER. Moreover, in the management of chronic diseases using mobile
monitoring applications, Big Data can help identify which behaviours are associated with negative
outcomes and which interventions are most effective.”
“There has been a lot of buzz around the potential for ‘Big Data’ to enable better decision making,”
says Mike Swinford, CEO, GE Global Healthcare Services. “Adding in human insight and process
control with analytical structures is what GE calls the ‘Industrial Internet’; Intelligent Machines –
Intelligent Information – Intelligent People. This is what the Industrial Internet is all about. In
healthcare, this strategic approach is a way to drive optimisation of assets, reduce operational
inefficiencies and improve clinical quality, all while reducing costs.”
According to Dr Abdul Rezzak Hamzeh, Senior Scientific Coordinator, Centre for Arab Genomic
Studies, Dubai, UAE, “A working example of using Big Data in healthcare in the GCC is through the
CTGA (Catalogue for Transmission Genetics in Arabs) database at the Centre for Arab Genomic
Studies in Dubai. The CTGA database is the largest ethnic-based genetic database worldwide and it
currently hosts a collection of over 1600 records of genetic disorders and their related genes. These
records provide good quality coverage of both clinical and molecular aspects of the geneticdisorder, and more importantly they offer comprehensive and updated coverage of research results
on these disorders in Arab populations.”
-END- Note to Editors
About Arab Health Exhibition & Congress
Arab Health Exhibition & Congress is the largest healthcare event in the Middle East. Established 39
years ago, Arab Health provides a platform for the world’s leading manufacturers, wholesalers and
distributors to meet the medical and scientific community in the Middle East and subcontinent. Arab
Health, organised by Informa Life Sciences Exhibitions, takes place from 27-30 January 2014 at the
Dubai International Convention & Exhibition Centre. With more than 3900 exhibiting companies
from 63 countries and 19 healthcare conferences with an estimated 9000 delegates, Arab Health is a
much anticipated addition to the 2014 medical event calendar.
Website: www.arabhealthonline.com
About Booz Allen Hamilton: Website: www.boozallen.com
About GE Global Healthcare:
Website: www.gehealthcare.com
About Arabic Genetic Centre:
Website: www.cags.org.ae
For press enquires please contact:
Weaam El-Ataya
PR & Social Media Executive
Informa Life Sciences Exhibitions
T: +971 4 408 2813
weaam.elataya@informa.com

domenica 2 febbraio 2014

WT1 as a biomarker to predict relapse in patients with acute leukemia and MDS

Relapse is a major obstacle to maximizing curative potential of allogeneic HCT (aHCT) therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). It has been shown that relapse can be detected through longitudinal application of quantitative PCR (qPCR) measurement techniques before patients (Pts) develop symptoms and that early intervention to delay or stop relapse can improve patient outcome. However, such tests apply only to a small percentage of Pts with fusion gene transcripts and specific mutations. WT1 has been investigated as a tumor marker in a variety of studies which have shown its association with disease progression and relapse. In our pilot work, based on WT1 kinetics data in a small cohort of Pts, we have shown the striking correspondence of increasing WT1 transcript levels with future relapse and the specific time frame between molecular relapse detected by the WT1 PCR test and hematologic relapse confirmed by clinical observations. Our plan is to establish ranges of WT1 transcript levels characteristic of Pts after aHCT that do not relapse, a high threshold level that can serve as a specific biomarker for relapse with close to or 100% specificity, and a less stringent threshold level with lower specificity to identify more Pts that relapse and at earlier times. We will also define the time interval when relapse is detected molecularly by qPCR methods, and later confirmed morphologically by standard clinical methods. Our hypothesis is that many of the Pts that will ultimately relapse will have a period of minimal residual disease that may be detected by repeated elevations of WT1 not exceeding the determined WT1 threshold levels. The ultimate purpose of our study is to apply this important biomarker as part of standard diagnostic procedures for detection of relapse in the highest-risk individuals – acute leukemia and MDS Pts undergoing aHCT.

FIRST v4.0 - Financial Impact of Recurrence Score Testing

FIRST v4.0 has been designed to
  1. Predict the financial implications to a health care plan of adopting the Oncotype DX® breast cancer assay for use in women with ER-positive early-stage invasive breast cancer.
  2. To permit plans to input their own characteristics and expected use of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay in determining the expected costs to the plan.

Inputs and data sources

Table 3. Inputs used in FIRST v4.0, separated into 8 categories.
Inputs used in FIRST v4.0, separated into 8 categories.
Data to inform the default values for many of the inputs were obtained from published materials, either from systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature or from publicly available data from government sources. The Navigation bar of FIRST v4.0 provides user access to information on source data (Figure 6).
Many of the inputs values are assumed to be plan specific, and the user is permitted to change these inputs to fit their individual plan’s characteristics. Ranges have been provided for several of the variables, designed to reflect the variability found in the published sources.

Results and computations

Table 4. FIRST v4.0 outputs
FIRST v4.0 outputs

User interface

There are two default value options that differ in their data sources for the frequency of RS risk groups. Figure 6 below shows the base case inputs given default values in which the RS risk group frequencies are based on a meta-analysis of published literature.2, 4, 10, 21-32
Figure 6. FIRST v4.0: Budget impact model inputs

Financial Implications of Recurrence Score Testing, v4.0

Showing default values: risk group frequency values from literature meta-analysis, base case.
Choosing Genomic health sales data default values changes the RS risk group frequency values (Input no. 4) to 57%, 32%, and 11% for low, intermediate and high risk groups in node negative patients. For node positive patients, the risk group frequencies would be, in the same order, 59%, 33%, and 8%.
Scenario analysis tools include lower bound, upper bound and breakeven analyses. The lower bound tool button models a scenario in which test utilization (Input no. 2) is 80% and the costs associated with chemotherapy (Input no. 7) are increased by 25%. In the upper bound scenario, test utilization is 50% and the costs associated with chemotherapy are decreased by 25%. Figure 7 below shows the results of the base case, lower bound and upper bound scenario analyses for both default values options in an abbreviated and condensed presentation of the results interface.
Figure 7. FIRST v4.0 interface. Budget impact model results
A. Default risk group fequency values: Literature meta-analysis
Default risk group frequency values: Literature meta-analysis
B. Default risk group frequency values: Genomic Health sales data
Default risk group frequency values: Genomic Health sales data
All computations – except for computing cost of recurrence – involve simple algebra. For example, the projected number of women per year with node-negative, ER-positive invasive breast cancer is the product of
  1. number of covered lives in the plan
  2. age-adjusted incidence of invasive breast cancer
The projected number of women per year to be tested is product of
  1. number of covered lives in the plan
  2. age-adjusted incidence of invasive breast cancer
  3. percent of women to be tested with the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay
The costs associated with change in chemotherapy use are computed as product of
  1. net change in chemotherapy use due to the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay
  2. associated costs for each cost component (drugs, supportive care, or adverse events)
Estimating the effect of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay on late costs of recurrence involves somewhat more detailed computations. FIRST v4.0 predicts when recurrence occurs, assigns a cost to that recurrence, and then adjusts the cost to net present value in 2010 US dollars, using a fixed annual discount rate of 3%.

Key findings (Budget impact model)

  • Every scenario examined results in a reduction in total costs (Table 5).
  • Net reduction of adjuvant chemotherapy use results in savings in the costs of chemotherapy drugs, administration, supportive care, and adverse events. (per patient tested per year)
    • Literature-based RS risk group frequency: $5,603 (range $4,202 to $7,004) savings.
    • GHI sales data: $6,744 (range $5,058 to $8,430) savings.
  • The humanistic benefits of avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy include preventing early toxicities (nausea and vomiting, alopecia) and late toxicities (development of new primary tumors, ovarian failure, and cognitive dysfunction).
Table 5. Scenarios results summary for a 2 million member plan
Scenarios results summary for a 2 million member plan

References

2. Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score® assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:55-65.
4. Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, et al. Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4063-71.
10. Klang SH, Hammerman A, Liebermann N, Efrat N, Doberne J, Hornberger J. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization. Value Health 2010;13:381-7.
21. Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1671-6.
22. Asad J, Jacobson AF, Estabrook A, et al. Does Oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? Am J Surg 2008;196:527-9.
23. Erb C, Fox K, Patel M. Evaluation of practice patterns in the treatment of node-negative, hormone-receptor positive breast cancer patients with the use of the Oncotype DX assay at the University of Pennsylvania. Abstract #3082. In: 30th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. San Antonio, TX; 2007.
24. Habel LA, Shak S, Jacobs MK, et al. A population-based study of tumor gene expression and risk of breast cancer death among lymph node-negative patients. Breast Cancer Res 2006;8:R25.
25. Liang H, Brufsky A, Lembersky B. A retrospective analysis of the impact of Oncotype DX low recurrence score results on treatment decisions in a single academic breast cancer center. Abstract #2061. In: 30th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. San Antonio TX; 2007.
26. Liebermann N, Baehner FL, Soussan-Gutman L, Klang S, Yoshizawa C, Shak S. Evaluation of Recurrence Score, nodal status and traditional clinicopathologic metrics in a large ER positive patient cohort. Abstract #1420. In: 2011 European Society for Medical Oncology. Providence, RI; 2011.
27. Oratz R, Kim B, Chao C, et al. Physician survey of the effect of the 21-gene recurrence score assay results on treatment recommendations for patients with lymph node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 2011;7:94-9.
28. Oratz R, Paul D, Cohn AL, Sedlacek SM. Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 2007;3:182-6.
29. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2817-26.
30. Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3726-34.
31. Partin JF, Mamounas EP. Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with standard clinicopathologic guidelines in adjuvant therapy selection for node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:3399-406.
32. Thanasoulis T, Brown A, Frazier T. The role of Oncotype DX assay on appropriate treatment for estrogen positive, lymph node negative invasive breast cancer. In: American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting. New York, NY; 2008.

Validity Assessment of Oncotype DX breast cancer assay economic analyses

Economic validity refers to the completeness, quality, and reliability of the analyses used to assess the economic implications of novel technologies. In 2003, Weinstein et al. outlined the criteria that should be considered when evaluating economic analysis.6 Four criteria have been established for systematically evaluating the quality and validity of economic evaluations, details of which are found in the appendix.
Six papers and one letter have been published in peer-reviewed journals on the potential economic implications of the Oncotype DX® breast cancer assay in four countries (Table 1). Furthermore, six additional studies, representing five countries, have been presented as abstracts. In total, the implications of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay have been evaluated in eight different countries.
Table 1. Summary of Health Economic Evidence
Summary of Health Economic Evidence

Economic Implications of Oncotype DX® in the United States

In the first economic analysis of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay in node-negative, ER-positive invasive breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen, Hornberger et al. performed cost-utility analyses using a decision analytic model.7Using a Markov model, they forecasted overall survival, costs, and cost-effectiveness of using the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay results (Recurrence Score) in patients classified as having low or high risk of distant recurrence based on 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) clinical guidelines. Data from a large multicenter clinical trial (NSABP B-14) were analyzed to derive risk classifications based on guideline criteria and the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) on distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) was based on published meta-analyses of CT trials. The analysis took a societal perspective, considering survival, quality of life, and relevant costs. Results showed fifty-three patients (8%) were classified as having low risk of distant recurrence by NCCN guidelines and the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay reclassified 15 of these patients (28%) to the intermediate or high risk groups. The remaining 615 patients (92%) were classified as having high risk of distant recurrence by NCCN guidelines and the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay reclassified 300 of these patients (49%) to low risk. Among a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients with node-negative, ER-positive early-stage invasive breast cancer (7.9% of whom are NCCN-classified as low risk for distant recurrence), use of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay was expected to reclassify two patients from low risk to intermediate or high risk and 45 patients from high risk to low risk. Assuming patients with intermediate or high risk receive chemotherapy and patients at low risk do not, the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay was predicted to, on average, increase quality-adjusted survival by 8.6 years and reduce overall costs by $202 828 (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Cost effectiveness of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay applied to cohort of 100 patients with node-negative, ER-positive early-stage invasive breast cancer
Cost effectiveness of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay applied to cohort of 100 patients
From Hornberger et al. Am J Manag Care 2005.7
The Oncotype DX breast cancer assay was cost saving in more than two-thirds of probabilistic simulations, with cost-effectiveness most influenced by the propensity to administer CT based on the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay results, and by the proportion of patients at low risk as defined by NCCN guidelines. Researchers concluded that the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay predicts recurrence risk in node-negative, ER-positive patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer more accurately than current guidelines.20 If applied appropriately, the assay is predicted to increase quality-adjusted survival and save costs.
In a 2007 economic analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay, Lyman et al. assessed the efficacy of therapy guided by the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay results (Recurrence Score).8 Using data from NSABP studies B-14 and B-20, patients were classified as high (RS ≥31), intermediate (RS 18-30), or low (RS < 18) risk for distant recurrence at 10 years. Cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated for therapy guided by the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay compared with either tamoxifen alone or combined chemotherapy and tamoxifen. Therapy guided by the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay was associated with a gain in individual life expectancy of 2.2 years compared with tamoxifen alone, and with similar life expectancy to that seen with combined chemotherapy and tamoxifen. Therapy guided by the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay was estimated to provide a net cost savings of $2,256 compared with chemotherapy and tamoxifen with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,944 per life year saved compared with tamoxifen alone (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Cost-effictiveness of Oncotype DX® breast cancer assay
Cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX breast cancer assay
From Lyman et al. Cancer 2007.8
Researchers concluded that for patients with lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive early-stage invasive breast cancer, treatment decisions based on therapy guided by the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay is associated with greater efficacy and acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios compared with tamoxifen alone. Compared with combined chemotherapy and tamoxifen, therapy guided by the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay is associated with similar efficacy and lower cost.
In 2010, Lo et al. at Loyola University Medical Center published the first prospective study on the decision impact of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay.21 It inquired about reanalysis of the economic implications of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay with their data. In response, Hornberger et al. applied the data reported by Lo et al. in the previously published decision analytic model and found a saving of more than $300 per patient tested.9
Hornberger et al. conducted a subsequent study in collaboration with Humana Inc., a large United States health insurance company, to examine the economic implications of adopting the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay within its health plan.15 Using published decision impact study of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay and cost data obtained from retrospective claims analyses of 952 invasive breast cancer patients who were tested with the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay, the study found that, for Humana, the adoption of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay was cost-saving (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® breast cancer assay adoption to Humana, Inc.
Cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX breast cancer assay adoption to Humana, Inc.
From Hornberger et al. Am J Manag Care 2011.15
To view the Hornberger et al. 2005 article please visit:http://www.ajmc.com/files/articlefiles/AJMC05MayHornbergr313to.pdf
To view the Lyman et al. 2007 article please visit: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/114124513/ABSTRACT
National Comprehensive Cancer Network® and NCCN® are registered trademarks of NCCN, which does not endorse any product or therapy.Economic implications of the Oncotype DX® breast cancer assay outside the United States
The economic implications of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay have been evaluated in seven countries outside the United States (Table 2).
Table 2. Summary of health economic evidence outside the United States
Summary of health economic evidence outside the United States

References

6. Weinstein MC, O'Brien B, Hornberger J, et al. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies. Value Health 2003;6:9-17.
7. Hornberger J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH. Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 2005;11:313-24.
8. Lyman GH, Cosler LE, Kuderer NM, Hornberger J. Impact of a 21-gene RT-PCR assay on treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer: an economic analysis based on prognostic and predictive validation studies. Cancer 2007;109:1011-8.
9. Hornberger J, Lyman GH, Chien R. Economic implications of 21-gene recurrence score assay: US multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:e382; author reply e3.
15. Hornberger J, Chien R, Krebs K, Hochheiser L. US insurance program’s experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Manag Care 2011;17:e194-202.
20. Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, et al. Prognostic Utility of the 21-Gene Assay in Hormone Receptor-Positive Operable Breast Cancer Compared With Classical Clinicopathologic Features. J Clin Oncol 2008.
21. Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1671-6.

The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay for DCIS Patients

The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay for DCIS is a multi-gene diagnostic assay designed to support personalized treatment planning for patients with DCIS following local excision. The assay provides an individualized estimate of the 10-year risk of local recurrence (DCIS or invasive carcinoma) to help guide treatment decision making in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by local excision, with or without tamoxifen.
The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay is performed in the licensed Genomic Health laboratory where the assay was developed. All H&E's are reviewed by board certified surgical pathologists and the DCIS tumor is marked for manual microdissection. The dissected, enriched tumor sample then undergoes RNA extraction. Next, the RNA is analyzed using a technique called real-time RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction). Finally, the DCIS Score™ result is calculated from the gene expression results.

Advantages of RT-PCR

The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay analyzes the expression of a panel of 21 genes from a tumor specimen using a technique called RT-PCR. A high-throughput, real-time RT-PCR method was developed to analyze the expression of select genes. Unlike routine histopathologic H&E slide review or assessment of immunohistochemical stains for hormone receptors, RT-PCR is sensitive, specific, highly reproducible, and has a wide dynamic range. RT-PCR is a mature technology that is routinely utilized in several clinical applications including viral load testing for HIV.
To quantify gene expression, RNA is extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FPET) tumor tissue and subjected to DNase I treatment. Total RNA content is measured and the absence of DNA contamination is verified. Reverse transcription is performed and is followed by quantitative TaqMan® (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.) RT-PCR reactions in 384-well plates. The expression of each of 16 cancer related genes is measured in triplicate and then normalized relative to a set of five reference genes.
The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay for DCIS patients standardized testing methods have been optimized to minimize variability due to:
  • Sources of pre-analytic variability: delay to fixation, choice of fixative, duration of fixation, age of sample

Oncotype DX Assay Development

The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay for DCIS patients was developed in four steps. Each of these steps is described in detail below.
  • Optimization of methods for quantifying gene expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (FPET)
  • Selection of 250 candidate genes from the human genome
  • Testing of candidate genes to identify an optimal gene panel for clinical validation
  • Prospective clinical validation of the gene panel and DCIS Score result calculation

Step 1. Optimization of methods for quantifying gene expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue

The ability to work with FPET samples is critical in the U.S., as this is the standard method for tumor preservation and storage. When tissue is preserved in paraffin, the RNA is fragmented. However, the relative ratio of RNA between genes is unchanged. By utilizing RT-PCR techniques, the expression of most genes—relative to a set of reference genes—can be measured. To develop the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay, Genomic Health researchers optimized RT-PCR technology 1) for high-throughput, real-time quantitation of specific RNA in FPET, and 2) to be reproducible regardless of the variability inherent in tumor blocks.

Step 2. Selection of 250 candidate genes from the human genome

Genomic Health researchers relied on numerous sources to identify 250 candidate genes—those possibly associated with breast cancer tumor behavior—from among the approximately 25,000 genes in the human genome.
GeneSelection

Step 3. Testing of candidate genes to identify an optimal gene panel for clinical validation

The 250 candidate genes were analyzed in a total of 447 patients from three independent clinical studies in order to identify a panel of genes strongly correlated with distant recurrence-free survival. The selection of the 16 cancer genes used for the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay was based on the results of the three clinical trials, which demonstrated a consistent and strong statistical link between these genes and distant breast cancer recurrence. Five reference genes were identified to normalize the expression of these cancer-related genes. The 21- gene panel described above has been optimized for the DCIS Score, which is calculated from a subset of the genes using a DCIS-specific algorithm and coefficients.

Step 4. Prospective clinical validation of the DCIS Score

The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay gene panel and DCIS Score result calculation were validated in a large, independent, multicenter clinical trial (ECOG E5194). The endpoints and analysis plan were prospectively defined. The results of this study were presented at the San Antonio Breast Conference 2011 and the results of the ECOG E5194 clinical validation study will be published in the near future.

21-Gene Panel Used to Calculate Recurrence Score® Result

The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay gene panel was selected from the published literature, a genomics database and experiments based on DNA arrays performed on fresh-frozen tissue. The DCIS Score is obtained by performing the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay, using a distinct DCIS algorithm and coefficients that was pre-specified because of its ability to predict recurrence in patients with DCIS regardless of whether adjuvant tamoxifen therapy was given.
Development of the DCIS Score algorithm was based on published results for the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay showing similarity in the expression profiles of the Recurrence Score genes between DCIS and Invasive Breast Cancer (IBC) when both are present within the same patient tumor. The DCIS Score algorithm was developed based on published data obtained from the Kaiser Permanente and NSABP B-14 studies in which the proliferation gene group, PR and GSTM1 were found to predict distant recurrence regardless of whether adjuvant tamoxifen therapy was given. This DCIS Score was subsequently validated as a predictor of local recurrence in patients from the ECOG E5194 study. These results were presented at the San Antonio Breast Conference 2011.

sabato 1 febbraio 2014

Donare per curare, il primo Rapporto sulla povertà sanitaria

La crisi morde e mette in discussione gli stili di vita. Diminuiscono i consumi delle famiglie che riducono la spesa alimentare, quella per l’abbigliamento e, sempre più spesso, quella sanitaria. Meno cibo, meno vestiti, meno medicine. Poiché il numero dei poveri assoluti, in cinque anni, dal 2007 al 2012, è aumentato del 60% arrivando a contare 4 milioni e 800 mila persone, quello che per le cronache è un problema economico rischia di trasformarsi anche in una questione di salute.
E’ quanto emerge dal primo Rapporto sulla povertà sanitaria e sulla donazione dei farmaci, “Donare per curare”, promosso dalla Fondazione Banco farmaceutico e presentato questa mattina a Roma. Lo studio è stato curato dall’Osservatorio nazionale sulla Donazione dei farmaci, composto da ricercatori dell’Università Cattolica e dell’Università statale di Milano, che hanno incrociato una serie di dati: quelli forniti da fonti statistiche ufficiali, quelli delle Giornate annuali per la raccolta del farmaco, quelli delle donazioni fatte dalle aziende di settore e le informazioni dei sistemi di monitoraggio degli oltre 1.500 enti caritativi della rete del Banco farmaceutico.
Negli ultimi anni, è aumentato il numero degli italiani che, per curarsi, si sono rivolti agli enti caritativi chiedendo aiuto: 680 mila persone nel 2013, il 57% delle quali italiane, scrivono nel Rapporto i ricercatori.
Le famiglie in Italia spendono, in media, il 3,7% del loro budget in sanità, cioè 92,45 euro al mese, destinando 44 euro ai farmaci. Quelle povere, invece, per le spese sanitarie utilizzano il 2% del bilancio familiare, cioè 16,34 euro, di questi 12,50 euro sono per l’acquisto di medicine.
Il diritto alla salute è un diritto incomprimibile. Eppure, viene sacrificato dalla parte più fragile della società, proprio lì dove si registra un aumento delle malattie, connesse a stili di vita e a rischi ambientali. La lista degli svantaggiati è lunga: immigrati, rifugiati, anziani con pensioni minime, adulti che hanno perso lavoro, famiglie numerose, ma anche giovani. Tutti cittadini sul piano costituzionale, ricorda don Francesco Soddu, direttore della Caritas, “tuttavia cittadini dimezzati sul piano politico e della salute”.
Nei primi nove mesi del 2012, spiega Giancarlo Rovati, professore di Sociologia generale che ha coordinato i ricercatori dell’Osservatorio, la spesa farmaceutica complessiva in Italia è stata pari a 15 milioni circa, di cui 9 milioni e duecento mila euro a carico del sistema pubblico per una spesa pro capite di 17 euro. Solo il 61% è stato, cioè, a carico del Servizio sanitario nazionale, mentre il restante 38,5% è stato pagato dalle famiglie che hanno sborsato 5 milioni e 700 mila euro. Una contrazione del contributo da parte dello Stato che ha costretto sette famiglie su dieci a ridurre la propria spesa sanitaria.
Non tutti ce la fanno. “In farmacia – racconta Annarosa Racca, presidente di Federfarma – la crisi si vive direttamente. Spesso ci vengono chiesti medicinali alternativi e meno costosi, talvolta c’è chi rinuncia addirittura al farmaco”. Un’emergenza, quella della “povertà sanitaria – le fa eco Paolo Gradnik, presidente della Fondazione Banco farmaceutico – con la quale siamo costretti a fare i conti quotidianamente”.
Il Banco farmaceutico, pertanto, cerca di rispondere ai bisogni delle persone indigenti, approvvigionando gli enti territoriali di assistenza, attraverso tre canali: le Giornate per la raccolta del farmaco (GRF), durante le quali i cittadini possono offrire farmaci da automedicazione, le donazioni da parte delle aziende farmaceutiche, che possono donare anche farmaci con obbligo di prescrizione medica, il recupero di farmaci validi (cioè non scaduti).
In sette anni, tra il 2007 e il 2013, la percentuale dei farmaci donati ha registrato un aumento del 241%, in numeri assoluti, sono stati raccolti 1 milione 162 mila farmaci, il 23% durante le GRF e il 1.345% donati dalle aziende farmaceutiche. Nel 2013, in particolare, la Fondazione ha distribuito medicinali per un valore di 30 milioni di euro. A dati così incoraggianti, però, corrisponde la diminuzione della capacità di soddisfare le richieste di farmaci: ne è aumentato il bisogno.
La ricerca della Fondazione del Banco farmaceutico evidenzia un ulteriore dato. Lo sbilanciamento territoriale. Infatti, lo scorso anno, hanno aderito alla GRF 3.366 farmacie distribuite su tutto il territorio nazionale, eccezion fatta per il Molise. Il tasso di adesione è stato più consistente al Nord, la regione più attiva è stata la Lombardia. Le donazioni raccolte sono state utili a rispondere al bisogno di 1.506 organizzazioni caritative, diffuse per il 22% in Lombardia, per il 12,5% in Emilia Romagna, per l’11,4% in Piemonte e per l’8,8% in Veneto.
I presidenti di Assogenerici, Enricue Hausermann, di Assosalute, Stefano Brovelli, e il presidente delle Acli, Gianni Bottalico, hanno appoggiato l’iniziativa del Banco farmaceutico e convenuto sulla necessità di proseguire lungo del strada del lavoro di squadra, fatto di alleanze virtuose.
“La Fondazione, conclude Gradnik, stando all’attuale congiuntura economica, non chiede aiuti pubblici in termini monetari”, ma rivolge l’appello a Marcella Marletta, direttore generale del Ministero della Salute, e al senatore Andrea Mandelli, presidente della Federazione degli Ordini dei farmacisti, affinchè diventi legge la proposta di rendere più semplice e fluido il transito dei farmaci lungo l’intera filiera della donazione, agevolando il canale privilegiato delle imprese che recupererebbero le eccedenze di produzione.
Trasformare in un bene sociale ciò che fino a oggi è stato uno spreco si potrà rispondere, ricorda don Soddu, all’invito di papa Francesco a trovare nuove strade per occuparsi creativamente e cooperare con efficacia affinchè i poveri vivano con dignità e a tutti sia garantita l’inclusione.
La Giornata per la raccolta del farmaco 2014 sarà organizzata il prossimo 8 febbraio.